I’m now “seeing” a strong potential for a woman president in 2044. The presidential race of 2008 and it’s outcome are very strong contributing factors to this. The outcome will motivate greater effort in the next few decades to have women be more active in the political scene and to bring forth a woman president.
Presidency / Politics
More on population growth
With population reaching 7 billion round 2022-2023, and reaching 8 billion around 2043, “severe” (by some’s standards) population control methods, rules and regulations will be in effect by 2050. These regulations will come in the 2030’s. Europe will set up population control regulations is the 2020’s. China already has pop. control regulations in place. Russia will follow along with Europe at the same pace. Africa has been trying and will continue to promote birth control more so in the 2010’s, with a push in 2012, 2013.
If the issue of population is dismissed and not dealt with realistically by the people of this planet moreso than the governments, there’s a possibility that we will reach 8 billion people in 2039, and the earliest being 2036. But, with concerted effort, the 8 billion mark will happen around 2043.
Electronic Chip
2090-91 will begin the steps the US government will take to require all people to wear a computerized chip within their bodies for identification purposes. All will be mandated to have it. The people within the government do not have the most sincerest of intentions and mean for this to be a way of controlling population. This will last for 40 years until better minds and hearts are in authority and make better decisions.
“State” of the union?
As part of a challenge from someone, I psychically looked at the state of consciousness of the elected officials we have in office in Washington, DC. I “saw” information that I didn’t expect.
The information I saw focused on the attitudes of the elected officials – their heart/mind intentions.
60% of the elected officials had what I think of as the “Reptilian” mind. It is an attitude of “Let’s go after the bad guys with a vengeance”. It is an attitude that suggests that it’s okay to use force to get what we want. They held in their consciousnesses that the way to handle problems was to overcome them with shere power. This was the same attitude in consciousness that was present in Atlantis during their militaristic conquesting centuries. It was this same attitude that led to creating karmic destruction. It holds within it – impatience, acceptence of the idea that violence over “our” enemies is okay, vengeance, hatred, acting from fear, peace through war, & control through overpowering. So, these 60% are creating similar results from their ways that Atlantis helped to create that we’re dealing with now (as I outline on my website). They are duplicating the attitudes that were in the emperialistic government of the latter Atlantean days. They have not learned yet that our actions towards others are our own destiny. These are the ones that are comfortable with attacking others if we justify it first, including politically, as in mudslinging.
However, while their methods and mindset are “force”-related, their intentions and hope guide them to try to find good results. These are not seekers of death, but rather dealing with their own impatience and seek to have good intentions.
Another 20% of the elected officials had the state of consciousness that they were in elected office to get what they could materially for their own benefit and for however long it lasts. These are the stereotypical “politicians” – in office to get whatever monetary or material perks they could get, regardless of the public needs they’re meant to serve. (Discouraging to “read” this.) These are the ones that sell their votes to whomever buys them. These are the ones that use their positions to better their own lives, rather than help those that elected them. These do a lot of posturing to “look” the part.
10% of the remaining 20% were overwhelmed by the daunting task of thinking they had to fight a huge uphill battle against a bureaucratic monolithic machine. They easily are overwhelmed, and feel that they can’t or won’t be able to accomplish much if anything. A subsection of these 10% are the average “Joe” that gets elected from the neighborhood. They are not professional politicians. However, they can be good “foot soldiers” depending on who influences them. They need a guiding influence and this direction can come from one type of official, or another.
The remaining 10% are the ones that actually accomplish helpful work. These are the “public servants” rather than “politicians”. Regardless of their background or how they get elected, these 10% spend their energy, and effort, persistently keeping at the task at hand. They pursue helpful legislation and work to help. They are not necessarily the media darlings, and don’t always have their work recognized by the big media outlets, but rather by their constituents. These are the ones that are “fighting the good fight” – the fight to help people with the challenges that are in their lives. To repeat – public servants, and not politicians.
Yet, even with what I see as only 10% being true public servants, these also are aware that there are many that will follow their lead, when something worthwhile comes forth. 10% can still be leaders that get a lot done, when many of the others follow along. If 1 in 10 is a leader of character in the positions they hold, then another 6-7 can be followers and still have some worthwhile work/help happen.
While there are different elected officials having different states of mind and heart with regard to the elected position, each and every one is there also by God’s giving them the authority they have. As Jesus said to Pontius Pilate, “You have authority over me right now, because God gave you this authority.” I can imagine Him also challenging Pilate with, “Now, what are you going to do with this authority? – use your authority to act responsibly to serve God, or instead try to serve yourself, washing your hands of the matter and pushing the blame onto others? History knows what he did. Each elected official must face this question within themselves.
Each and every elected official needs our prayers. If we don’t do our work, putting forth no effort helping in whatever way we can, we have little foundation to criticize them in their efforts. It is for us to try to help them with the tasks we give to them. Would we rather have a person representing us in office who is being prayed for or one who is not being prayed for? Which one do you think God’s presence may be helping more? Remember, God’s Spirit and presence touches the lives of those prayed for more than those not prayed for.
If we don’t contribute our help in some form, then we are following Pilate’s example of washing our hands of the problems, pushing them onto and blaming others. We have been given the authority by God, as voters and citizens to contribute either spiritually, politically, or any other way we may feel we can.
2008 Election
Even though I’ve psychically seen that the next 6 presidents will be “white” “men”, I also see that there are scenarios that can happen to change this. Freewill is real, but predictions come from “seeing” patterns of thinking and behavior. I don’t see a lot of changes to how people currently think and behave, therefore predictions can be made. The road being traveled is most likely the road we’ll be on come Nov, 2008.
I do see that if Hillary Clinton wins the democratic nomination and she picks Barak Obama as her running mate, together they can win the presidential race. With this Sen. Obama could enter the white house in 2016.
But by themselves, they will come very close, but I don’t yet see a way one of them can win by him or herself. If there is a way that I’m not seeing, then it will be an EXTREMELY close race, with a winner only having the slimmest of winning margins.
If Mitt Romney wins the presidential race, his presidency will be for 2 years. I see a potential illness causing him to be bedridden. If Mitt Romney and John McCain joined together, they would win by a large margin, but I don’t see that happening.
So, there are alternate paths, and this ability to have alternate paths comes from personal choices made by the candidates.
As of this date, the Republican candidate is who I see winning.
Iraq
The next president will take 4 years to remove 70% of the troops we have in Iraq (up to 2012). The remaining 30% will gradually be reduced in Iraq until 2017, with but a few stragglers at that point. 2012 will come with 30% remaining, 2013 will arrive with 24%, 2014, will see 20%, 2015 will see 16%, 2016 will see 5-6% left, and 2017 will see less than 1% of the current troop level remaining in Iraq. If the next president has 2 terms, it will take this person all 8 years to remove all but the last of the troops. 99% of all the troops that are there now.
3rd political party
A third political party will be prominent in the 2nd next presidential election, (not the next one, 2008, but the one after the next one, 2012.) and again in the 5th next, 2024. (Added 8/10/05)
Presidency
I’m “seeing” the next 6 presidents after G. W. Bush be white men. The 6th could be 1/4 Hispanic – having a grandparent who is Hispanic. The 4th next vice-president could be a woman with black hair (if she accepts the position.) The 6th next president will be president only a few months before his health causes him to no longer be president. There is potential for the 7th next president to be a black man, but it would be a challenging race. A black man will be chosen as his party’s nominee. (Added 8/10/05)
There will be one black man who can become president, on or around 2044-2048 and possibly one president who is a mixed race Hispanic/White around 2064. There will absolutely be one woman president during this century, closer to the end of the century, in the time around 2084-2088. (Added 8/3/06)
In 2008, if Sen. Obama or Sen. Clinton is the Democrat’s choice to run against a Republican in the presidential election, the Republican will win. (Added 6/11/07)